No. Censoring movies and filtering movies are two distinct approaches with different purposes and methods. Let us explain.
Censoring movies involves the removal, alteration, or restriction of certain content deemed inappropriate, offensive, or sensitive by a governing body, regulatory authority, or organization. Censorship can take various forms, such as cutting scenes or even banning entire films from public exhibition. The decisions regarding censorship are often made based on prevailing cultural norms, legal regulations, and the judgment of the censoring authority.
Filtering movies, on the other hand, is a process carried out by individuals or families to customize the content they consume based on their personal preferences or specific requirements. It involves using technology, such as parental control software or content-filtering tools, to selectively block or modify certain elements within movies. For example: skipping offensive scenes such as violence, explicit language, sexual content, or other potentially objectionable material. The purpose of movie filtering is to tailor the viewing experience to align with personal or family values, protect children from unsuitable content, or cater to specific sensitivities or preferences.
It’s important to note that while censoring movies is typically enforced by external authorities, filtering movies is a voluntary action taken by individuals or families to regulate the content they consume. Censorship is often associated with legal or regulatory frameworks, while filtering is a matter of personal choice and control.
Like this article? Check out: “Would VidAngel paint over nude paintings?”